🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous respondents praising your advice on growing your venture? Are headhunters making contact to discuss collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the explanation could be your gender.

The Experiment: Modifying Profile Gender for Better Visibility

Dozens of women joined a collective LinkedIn experiment recently following viral posts indicated that switching their gender to "man" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to include what they termed "bro-coded" language - inserting results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in the platform's system prioritizes male users who use online business jargon.

Like many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to determine which content are shown to which members - promoting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how content are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your posts shows up in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "he/him" and her profile name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her reach decrease significantly.

The Process

• First, she modified her gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she recycled previous content with comparable "assertive" style

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Previously, my posts were more personal - brief and clever, but also warm and human," she explained. "Currently, the masculine version was forceful and confident - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She abandoned the experiment after one week, stating "Every day I persisted, and results improved, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Not all testers experienced positive outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her race to "white" described a decrease in reach and engagement.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests coincide with continuing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in the past few months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where the same content by men and women received vastly different reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and distribute content based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in some users' reach might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and less controlled."