🔗 Share this article

The number of guaranteed positions for Māori representatives on New Zealand local authorities will be cut by over 50%, following a divisive law change that forced local governments to submit the future of hard-won Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Historical Context on Māori Wards

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have multiple councillors based on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to give Māori electors the option to elect a assured Indigenous council member in municipal and provincial governments. Initially, local governments could only establish a Māori ward by initially putting it to a community referendum in their region. Communities often devoted considerable time generating community backing and urging their councils to establish Māori wards.

Legislative Shifts and Administrative Decisions

To remedy the issue, the former administration permitted local councils to establish a Māori ward without first requiring them to subject it to a popular ballot.

However, this year, the current administration reversed the change, saying communities ought to determine whether to establish Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation mandated councils that had established a ward under the previous policy to conduct decisive public votes alongside the local body elections, which ended on October 11. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the public vote, 17 voted to keep their wards, and 25 to abolish theirs – showing many regions against guaranteed Māori representation.

The results provided “a crucial move in restoring local democratic control.”

Critics however have condemned the new policy as “racist” and “against Indigenous interests”. After assuming power, the coalition government has implemented extensive reversals to policies designed to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. The government has stated it aims to terminate “ethnic-specific” approaches, and asserts it is committed to enhancing results for Māori and every citizen.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the referendums were split down city-country divisions – most urban centers mandated to hold referendums supported Indigenous seats, while countryside areas skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to hit their stride.”

Voter Turnout and Criticism

This year’s local government elections registered the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with less than a third of citizens participating, prompting calls for an overhaul.

This approach had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Councils are able to create other types of electoral districts – including countryside seats – without first requiring a public vote. The disparate requirements applied to Māori wards suggested the administration was targeting Māori representation.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have expressed strong opposition.”

This statement referred to the 17 regions that voted to retain their seats.